Preface
Brief context on crypto wallet user experience
Cryptocurrency wallets are essential tools for interacting with blockchain networks, enabling users to store, manage, and transact with their digital assets. The user experience (UX) of cryptocurrency wallets is critical to their adoption, but it often presents significant challenges that can deter users. Two primary approaches to wallet management—self-custody and managed custody—each come with their own set of pain points that impact the overall user experience.

Self-Custody: Complex and Intimidating
While self-custody offers true ownership and aligns with the decentralized ethos of blockchain technology, it can be a daunting experience for users. The following pain points are commonly associated with self-custody:
Seed Phrases: Users are required to generate and securely store a seed phrase—a long string of random words used to recover their wallet. The burden of remembering and safeguarding this phrase can be overwhelming, as losing it means losing access to all funds in the wallet.
Browser Plugins and Mobile Apps: Navigating various browser plugins and mobile apps to interact with decentralized applications (dApps) is cumbersome. Users often need to switch between different interfaces, which can be confusing and time-consuming, especially for those unfamiliar with the technology.
QR Codes and Application Access: Scanning QR codes to connect wallets to dApps adds another layer of complexity. This process can feel archaic and unintuitive, particularly for users accustomed to more seamless experiences in traditional finance apps.
Managing Different Networks: Many wallets require users to manually switch between different blockchain networks (e.g., Ethereum, Binance Smart Chain). This network management can be confusing, leading to errors like sending funds to the wrong network, which can result in loss of assets.
Managed Custody: Risky and Contrary to Blockchain's Principles
Managed custody involves trusting a third party, such as an exchange or wallet service, to hold and manage users' private keys. While this option simplifies the user experience by abstracting away the complexities of self-custody, it introduces significant risks and undermines the core principles of blockchain technology:
Security Risks: Relying on a third party for custody exposes users to potential security breaches. If the custodian is hacked or experiences an internal failure, users could lose access to their funds. This risk contradicts the fundamental promise of blockchain technology, which is to provide secure and decentralized ownership of assets.
Defeating Blockchain's Purpose: One of the primary goals of blockchain technology is to eliminate the need for intermediaries, giving users direct control over their assets. Managed custody reintroduces an intermediary, effectively centralizing what should be a decentralized process. This centralization not only increases risk but also diminishes the trustless nature that makes blockchain technology appealing in the first place.
Last updated